Monday, June 18, 2007

Problem Reaction Solution

Well as Fox News and members of the neocon administration champion the call to war with Iran, I thought I'd take a quick look at all the events that conveniently happened
to pull the US and other powerful countries into war as well as cause other things.

On February 15th 1898, the USS Maine mysteriously explodes in the Havana harbor. Spain is immediately blamed, initiating what's known as "Yellow journalism". Thus begins the impetus of the US war with Spain. There remains over a century later much controversy, as many historians believe
the ship was intentionally blown up from within.

In 1907, a group of wealthy international bankers spread rumors of a financial collapse in the newspapers, causing the "Panic of 1907", which was heavily incited by deliberate manipulation of the markets. This paved the way for bills that were previously halted and of course the Federal Reserve

In 1915, German U-boats sank the Lusitania, killing 1200 Americans. This was the act that brought the US into the German-English(World War 1)
It has come to light that those within the UK and US government that wanted a pretext for the US to enter the war, intentionally had the giant cruiseliner sent to known hostile waters, had ammunitions on board, and
advertised to Germans that it was coming.

February 27, 1933: The Reichstag Parliament building in Germany is burned down, initiating Hitler and the Nazis total take over of the state and their march toward war and genocide. A lone incoherent naked Dutch communist was blamed, but many historians believe much of the damage came from within the building itself and was set by the Nazis. As a result, civil rights, free speech, political dissent, etc were all curbed...and the attack was used to spur on invasion after invasion with the scapegoating of a whole race and religion of people.

On December 7th 1941 the US fleet at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii was mercilessly attacked by Japanese bombers. However, it turns out FDR as well as people within the administration may have not only known the attack was coming, but were ordered to do everything in their power in the months leading up to incite and provoke the attack.

August 4th 1964: The US claims that the Vietnamese attacked their ships in the Gulf of Tonkin. The incident did not take place, yet the White House cooked up a story to sell to the public, initiating the Gulf of Tonkin resolution that got the US into the war...killing 58,000 US servicemen, wounding/psychologically scarring many more, and killing a couple million Vietnamese

On June 8th 1967 Israel tried for hours to sink an American ship called the USS Liberty during the six day war. New evidence has surfaced through survivors, tapes, declassified information, etc that LBJ recalled the US war planes that were being sent to ward off the ISraeli aggression. It's now believed that the attack on the USS liberty by Israel was not a mistake, but possibly a plan by the US and Israel to blame the attack on Egypt, thus bringing America into the war.

In September 1999, a series of explosions rocked Moscow and outlying areas, apparent terror attacks which leveled buildings and killed hundreds. Chechyns were immediately blamed, and Putin used this to crackdown on all Chechyns living in Russia and began the start of the second Chechyn war...a war which killed over 200,000 innocents in Chechyna. It has since come out
that the deadly terror attacks were carred out by FSB intelligence operatives as part of a false flag attack. This has been backed up by the fact civilians caught the FSB operatives trying to blow up a fourth apartment building, the bomb leading back to those used in the other attacks and the subsequent whistelblowing of people within the FSB. Chechyns had nothing to do with the attacks, but the damage was done. Since then, a lot of the journalists and government whistleblowers who have tried to expose this false flag attack in the mainstream have been killed.

On September 11th, 2001 four commercial jetliners slammed into the world trade center, the pentagon US millitary nervecenter, and a field in Pensylvania. By the end of the day, World Trade Towers 1, 2 and 7 were gone and a lot of downtown Manhattan lay in damage with the public in total horror. This attack led to the US invading Afghanistan and Iraq, and basing countless policies and ideologies on this event. However, it's come to light that higher ups within Pakistan's intelligence and Saudi intelligence were controlling and funding the 19 hijackers. As well, the US government's Able Danger program at the Pentagon had been tracking ringleader Mohammed Atta and several others. All through 2001, the FBI had been told hundreds of times not to go after terrorists training at US flight schools, or to go after Osama or Saudi terror funding.

Finally, in July of 2006, Israel began a blitzkrieg of Lebanon, destroying large portions of Beirut and souther Lebanon. This was done as a response to Hezbolla allegedly kidnapping two Israeli soldiers from Israel. Turns out, the two IDF soldiers were captured on Lebanese soil where they were sent. The strike on Lebanon had been planned for at least six months and had Washington DC approval.

So when the globalist puppetmasters known as the Council on Foreign relations warn of "Al Qaeda staging a false flag attack to blame on Iran to get the US into war"...one has to wonder, who do they mean by "al Qaeda"?

Thursday, June 14, 2007

The Wallstreet Journalist And The Ugliest Secret

While people are making a bunch of noise about Jolie playing a woman of color in the upcoming new film A Mighty Heart, the BIG story is getting unnoticed. The film is about the kidnapping of American Wallstreet Journalist reporter Daniel Pearl by Islamic extremists in Pakistan, and his wife Mariane Pearl's search for truth and justice.

The ugly secret? That, Daniel Pearl(and from it sounds like his widow) along with others in the book of A Mighty Heart...have some suspicions regarding September 11th, as well as the role of Pakistani ISI.

This is a direct quote from pages 183-184:

----------------
(this is regarding the man who was said to be responsible for Pearl's death Omar Saaed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Sheikh)

"
It's become clear that Omar doesn't know where Danny is. That's never been his role. He was the lure; others are the captors. Who's in that group? Omar has served up the name of a go-between, the man who's had contact both with Omar's cell and the kidnapping team. That's a start. But who is overseeing it all? Who pulls all the strings?

I think about things like this: Who told Omar that Danny is Jewish? Who had that information to give?

Information flies out of the Internet. I am amazed to find how much is circulating out there about Omar and his apparent links to both Al Qaeda and the ISI. I read that the U.S. embassy in Islamabad asked the Pakistani government to hand over Omar on January 21--two days before Danny was kidnapped. The reason given for the U.S. request was that the 1994 kidnapping included an American citizen. But it seems clear to me that the U.S. authorities wanted to follow up on a much more disturbing trail. I read a news report from October that claimed the FBI had found "credible links" between Omar Saeed Sheikh and then director of the ISI Lieutenant General Mahmood Ahmed. It was alleged that it was Ahmed who instructed Omar to wire the $100,000 to Mohammad Atta.

I read too that disclosure of this finding led to Ahmed's dismissal as the head of the ISI by President Musharraf on October 7, 2001.

So it appears Omar may have been associated with both the head of ISI and Al Qaeda.
He surrendered to another former ISI officer who held him in custody for a week until just one day before Musharraf met with President Bush. Just in time for Musharraf to go before Bush and the American press and, pointing to the "arrest" of Omar Sheikh, declare, "We are as close as possible to getting [Danny] released."

Questions bounce back and forth in my brain like a Ping-Pong ball gone wild. The distinctions between good and bad, government organizations and terrorist organizations, are not simply fading; they seem to be faces of the same coin.


Did Musharraf know Omar was in custody? Could he not know?


The CIA (God only knows what their position is here) didn't know? Which of Omar's ex-ISI friends are involved and to what degree?
What about Brigadier Abdullah, responsible for the Kashmir Cell of ISI before his dismissal by Musharraf during the recent purges of the organization. Is he involved, too? Does he work for Osama bin Laden? What was Omar promised in exchange for his arrest?

-------------------------------

Gee, I wonder if this will be in the movie? Even toward the end of the HBO documentary on Pearl's kidnapping called "The Journalist and the Jihadi", as well as the book "Who Killed Daniel Pearl", it appears Pearl was killed for finding out that Pakistani ISI controls al Qaeda and was involved in 9/11.
When KSM "confessed" he killed Pearl and was a part of 9/11, he was correct. Only, he was being puppeteered by the ISI. And I wonder who the ISI answers to?

In Page 31 Marianne Pearl writes:

Corruption is endemic among the Pakistani police; that's a story Danny and I have been researching for months. In fact, it's possible that calling the police is precisely the wrong thing to do now. Can we call Pakistani intelligence? ISI, Inter-Services-Intelligence--the role of the agency is so murky, frightening. We've heard it called "a kingdom within a state"; we know that little happens in this country without ISI knowing about it. But what if they're involved?

It's no wonder ISI has been behind the Taliban resurgence, is helping to protect Osama, and is linked to so many terror attacks.

Pages 27 thru 30 of her book go into how her and Daniel were told by top ISI officials that it was "Israeli Mossad" behind 9/11, and regardless if there really was...it's clear that between people like General Mahmoud Ahmed, RG Abbas, Omar Sheikh, etc 9/11 had ISI complicity all over it.

As a side note of irony, Marine writes on page 30:

In Pakistan, Danny reported, pilots, scientists, and experts had gathered for analysis, and they had all concluded that the attacks could not have succeeded without the help of American intelligence services or the Israelis. "Pakistani air force officers casually opine that 'Mossad is the only one that could do it.' Respected newspapers in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates run news items suggesting authorities suspect some Israelis of involvement in the attack... One Pakistani commentator told the BBC Friday that America's belligerent attitude 'gives credence' to conspiracy theories spreading on the Internet."

Ironically, its been exposed in the mainstream that Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11, and Bush is covering for it.
Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11, and Bush is covering for it. It's also been widely shown that the United Arab Emirates was involved in 9/11 as well as directly funding al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. These say royals and officials in bed with al Qaeda of course regularly meet with the Bush administration. What's going on here?

Thanks to Jon Gold for transcribing pages from the book. Check out the trailer here for the movie coming out soon.

Is Al Qaeda Into Numerology?

Let's look at the big "al qaeda" attributed terror attacks from 9/11 to recently:

9/11 (11 years to the day after bush sr's nwo speech)
3/11 (911 days after 9/11, the 2004 Madrid Spain attacks)
7/11 (2006, confirmed to be the work of pakistani ISI in mumbai india)
7/7 (MI6 Haroon Aswat masterminded 2005 london attacks)
10/7 (tourist hotels in the Sinai in Egypt in 2004)
4/11 (Algeirian capital attack this year)
11/9 (2005 attack in jordan, mirrors the date "9/11")
7/23 (2005 bombings in Egypt)

These are the bulk of the most famous and well known post 9/11 terror attacks blamed on "al Qaeda". Notice anything about the dates?

Is it me, or does "al Qaeda" have a fixation with the number 11 and 7? And if not al Qaeda...perhaps, a signature of whose REALLY behind the attacks?
I know people roll their eyes at the numerology stuff, but come on.

Even ABC News ran a story wondering what's up with the symbolic patters of the dates chosen for these attacks. ""There's a lot of symbolism involved when terrorists choose their targets and the dates of their attacks," said Jack Cloonan, a former FBI agent on the bin Laden squad who now works as an ABC News consultant."Who knows?" said Cloonan.
Oh there is definately a lot of symbolism when terror dates are chosen...I guess it just depends who one thinks the terrorist masterminds are. While there was a 16th century secret occult order out of Afghanistan called the Roshaniya(that allegedly was one of the inspirations for Adam Weishaupt's Illuminati)I see no evidence that "jihadi Wahabists" are into occult numerology. No, that seems to be a specialized flavor of the not so Arab secret society globalists. Symbolism is everything, hidden in plain view. And I could devote pages and pages to the esoteric symbolism of Washington DC, the back of the one dollar bill, government building architecture, corporate logos, etc...but that's for a different time.

Let's look at 9/11 for instance:

An attack on the 11shaped twin towers, which were 110 stories tall,
initiating the attack with Flight 11 *ON* 9/11 exactly 11 years to the date after Bush Sr's "new world order" speech...AND 11 years before
2012, when the 1776 feet tall freedom tower obelisk rises on the souls of 3000 sacrificed souls. 9/11 was also 60 years to the day after ground was broke for the pentagon.

I found this online which I found interesting:
The number 11 has been linked to mystery and power since ancient times. All forms of number research and study, including Numerology, the ancient science of Gematria, and the secret wisdom of Kabbalah, all give significant importance to 11, and 11 derivatives - 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88, and 99. The number 11 is considered a master number. The overwhelming quantity of elevens, surfacing from the events, people, and places related to the 9-11-2001 attacks, is remarkable. It is as if someone planned the events to occur around the number eleven. If it was
not planned, then the coincidence of the numbers, seems even more mysterious and improbable.


Just to get a little bit deeper with 9/11:
Beginning with American Airlines Flight 11,
the other three planes had a sequential order:
United Airlines Flight 93 9 + 3 = 12
United Airlines Flight 175 1 + 7 + 5 = 13
American Airlines Flight 77 7 + 7 = 14
In my view, 9/11 was ultimate regardless of who physically pulled it off, a massive occult megaritual. The towers of course representing the Boaz and Jachin pillars of Solomon's temple, and the Pentagon with it's heavy symbolism. The Twin Towers and Pentagon nicely fit within the Kabbalic tree of life. There's a really thought provoking 10 minute short on youtube that goes into all the esoteric symbolism of the Twin Towers and Pentagon here.

lets look at the assassinations

JFK = 11/22
MLK = 4/4
RFK = 6/6
Reagan attempt by Bush family friend = 3/30

hmmm, all dualities.

Is this how we know when something is the work of the global shadow elites?
Assassinations that happen on duality dates and terror attacks that occur with 7 or 11 in the date? Strange that most of the CIA predator hellfire drone missiles fired on Pakistani innocent villagers have happened on Friday the 13th or the 30th.

I wont go into how a lot of massacred and bombings get reported as "33" dead
(VA Tech, Algiers 4/11 attack, the initial 7/7 attack report on BBC, etc), tho "33" is one of the elite's favorite number: order out of chaos.
I used to think all this talk was crazy too, but I'm starting to wonder if maybe there is something more to it.

Now you wanna get really strange? One year to the day after 9/11, the New York State lottery ball numbers came out to be 9-1-1. As well, on the one year anniversary of 9/11, the Chicago stock market closed out at 9.11 Truth is stranger than fiction.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Tony Blair Says Major Internet Clampdown Needed

According to mainstream reports, Tony Blair is now saying there needs to be a major new clampdown on internet journalist.

Is it me or is Blair on his way out WANTING people to see his Labor Party
as a total Orwellian authority? Forget the millions of CCTV cameras...
Tony Blair hinted today at new restrictions on internet journalism, saying online news coverage had become "more pernicious and less balanced" than traditional political reporting.
In a farewell lecture on public life, he said that much of the British media behaved like a "feral beast, just tearing people and reputations to bits".
"In fact, the new forms can be even more pernicious, less balanced, more intent on the latest conspiracy theory multiplied by five."


Ooh, did you get that? I guess there's too many "conspiracy theorists" running around online "posing as journalists", better clamp down on the net Chinese government style! Gee, I seem to recall the Blair/Bush government lying about WMD's in Iraq, and then Bush suggested a drone plane be painted in UN colors and hope it shot down over Iraq.
Good to see the false flag Tonkin spirit is alive and well. Oh, but people like me are the "conspiracy theorists", and the reason why the internet needs to get a major clampdown. :)

A Tentacle By Any Other Name

You know, I've become disgusted with how Michael Moore has become over the years. I now have very mixed feelings to say the least on Bowling For Columbine and I now realize Fahrenheit 9/11 was a pretty big white wash from the more disturbing facts. But after seeing his new film Sicko(which has been put online here...apparently Moore is down with freeware viewing of his work)
I have to say he has *somewhat* redeemed himself. Sicko is by far his best film to date I'd have to say, as it totally exposes in every way possible the total evil and corruption of the big health care scheme in America. This dovetails with another new documentary I say called Maxed Out(see trailer here)
as well as a new Ralph Nader documentary An Unreasonable Man. I was saddened to see how despite such a massive amount of brave things and real change Nader brought about, the left still blames him for Gore losing(Um, hello...it's called
voter fraud, manipulation and theivery!) Now if Sicko shows us the sheer depths the HMO's in America will go to wrap their tentacles around Washington DC and decide who gets to live or die in America...Maxed Out shows how the biggest poison affecting countless millions in America is credit cards and debt lending. It's truly sad how
destructive debts, financial burdens, etc wrecks the average American. We;re brainwashed into thinking we need to have this, have that, and never own anything of great financial value for many years..always just barely paying interest or student loans. We're bombarded by this schizophrenic message of what to buy, to be thin but eat this new triple cheeseburger...depressed? Take this pill! Wondering how messed up the world is? Aw, why not turn into the latest episode of 24, Lost and Heroes...ooh, I hear Paris Hilton and Britney Spears got into a fight? Is the youtube clip on your ipod? Here, watch some sports! Maybe ya can be a contestent on Big Brother...oh wait, you're living in big brother.


However a new online documentary I just saw(available here) completely exposes and goes in depth with the corrupt Federal Reserve and central banking system; that has literally controlled America
since 1913. The documentary shows how the Federal Reserve came to be after the international bankers behind the Fed used their clout over the newspaper to create the financial bank panic of 1907. As well as wishing to their lucky stars the Lusitania would be sunk by German U-boats, that Japan would attack America, and the margin loan scam that brought about the Depression. Some may stay studying finances is boring, but when you see
how much control and effect they've had just with war profiteering alone...it's staggering.(The documentary also goes into the scam of Vietnam, as well as how Bayer's IG Farben and President Bush's grandfather along with the Rockefellers funded both sides of world war 2...Nazis, and American)

Anyways, I was happy to see Sicko bring to light just how many of the 9/11 rescue workers, first responders, police, firemen, etc are suffering I was quite relieved. As USA Today reports, so many of the 9/11 heroes are suffering and dying. However what Sicko DOESN'T expose is how the White House faked air quality reports to tell everyone the air was "safe to breathe". No masks required! Even according to conservative NYPost, Condi Rice OK'd the safe air claim.
The government then went on to block emergency medical funding to the suffering firemen, EMT, police, etc. early on and has pretty much turned their back on the heroes they once trumpeted. Now we see Guiliani(Ghouliani?) exploiting 9/11 even more with his bid for the presidency. However, the mainstream media is starting to report how he covered up the fact the city illegally purchased Motorola radios for the fire department that didn't work...something many people attribute to the mass confusion and death of hundreds of firefighters.

You already know how the US government treats it's soldiers when they get back, and are finally seeing how they've been treating the 7/10 September 11th responders who are suffering and dying. Some of the most visible people raising awareness and a lot of funding/care for these people are what the Fox News Bushbots and even a lot of the left would call "fringe tinfoil hatwearers"...as I guess questioning anything the government does
outside of a Colbert/Jon Stewart "safe" level is "unpatriotic".

The biggest "evil" one can do in America according to the left and right is to even imply elements of the US government consciously allowed or was in any way complicit in the tragedy that killed 3000 Americans(and killed/maimed countless thousands more innocent Arabs and US soldiers)
In this Mccarthy era like witchhunt world, "commie" has been replaced with "conspiracy theorist"...but I tell ya, at the very least we can clearly see how the government is killing not just it's own people, but the very people it claims are it's heroes.

And now the soldiers coming home and yet to come home, and the heroes of that awful day are waking up to a grim reality. And Americans as a whole are waking up to a grim reality...a financial grim reality, where the American dollar literally could collapse bringing us to a 1929 like depression...as the public continues to sink down into a financial debt nightmare. Oh, yet people say the economy is "booming", especially compared to the early 90's era recession. Oh how ye of little forefight to the very fabric of things at it's breaking point.

By the way, there's a great hour long Sundance Documentary called Dust To Dust, hosted by Steve Buschemi that really goes into what the government did to the 9/11 heroes who are now suffering from the ground zero dust coverup.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Is Iraq Really Going Wrong?

One thing I see continually repated over and over by the left(and even some on the right) is that "Iraq is going horribly". No actually, the situation in Iraq is going quite well for the people who originally envisioned and wanted the 2003 invasion. I won't go into the plan to stage and make up false information about Iraq and "WMDs" and "ties to al Qaeda", I'm sure even a bulk of the war supporters know those were lies.

But as far as I can see, the architects of this war that's killed and maimed an unGodly amount of innocent Iraqis(not to mention quite a few American and coalition forces) wanted to incite and bring on insurgency, sectarian violence and all out chaos. Remember when Bush told the insurgency to "bring it on"? This chaos ensured three things: Prolonging the war to allow government tentacled corporations to make a killing, setting up permanent bases, and providing the pretext to "Balkanize" the region into three regions. Now if you're wondering why I didn't mention oil...the reason why the government hasn't gone hog wild in taking the oil just yet, is because that would not just validate the popular belief that it's "all about the oil", but also because the plans for Iraq are far from complete.
The permenant bases does two things: like a dog marks it's territory, furthering Western hegemony like a notch on a bedpost in the middle east. And two, turns Iraq into a launchpad for the next middle eastern country to take over. Is it merely a coincidence the two countires bordering on either side of Iran just happen to be Afghanistan and Iraq...the two countries the US government invaded?

In a new NY times article, they state that the US is arming and backing Sunni insurgency all the sudden. Say what? The same guys that focused all their effort to blow up Americans and innocents, is now being a tool of the US? Oh...it's all to "fight al Qaeda", the tentacle
reaching ultimate bad guy group ala GI Joe's C.O.B.R.A.(heck we were told al Qaeda even has COBRA like hi-tech bases in the side of mountains. SNAKE EYES!)
Now as Americans, we got used to hearing "al Qaeda" as the "Im rubber your glue" response to everything. "Mr. President, why are you making it difficult for seniors to have adequate drug coverage, and stripping away our civil liberties?"..."al Kwayduhs! al Kwayduhs gonna get you! They could be under your bed or making WMD's
at Michaels craft store and Joanne fabrics!" But I digress.

A lot of people might not know that Rumsfeld initiated a program called P2OG whose mission status was literally to incite insurgency, terrorism and sectarian violence in Iraq. According to a classified document prepared for Rumsfeld by his Defense Science Board, the new organization--the "Proactive, Preemptive Operations Group (P2OG)"--will carry out secret missions designed to "stimulate reactions" among terrorist groups, provoking them into committing violent acts which would then expose them to "counterattack" by U.S. forces.

This is chaos by design folks..."Order out of Chaos" as President Bush so eloquently put it. You then have the fact that the horrific Abu Gharib
sex torture was not only white washed(trust me, they didn't let loose with the real evil shit going on there), but it was part of Rumsfeld and company's "Copper Green" program and not some "foolhardy"
work of a few subbordanates. From the New Yorker "Copper Green, encouraged physical coercion and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners in an effort to generate more intelligence about the growing insurgency in Iraq. A senior C.I.A. official, in confirming the details of this account last week, said that the operation stemmed from Rumsfeld’s long-standing desire to wrest control of America’s clandestine and paramilitary operations from the C.I.A.". Whereas Bush may not know the difference between Sunni and Shiites, Bushes puppetmasters sure do...and they are doing all they can to further divide that wedge...even if it means playing off and inciting both sides.

Even Colin Powel the other day asked for the closing of Guantánamo Bay, just one of many facilities like all the illegal secret CIA prisons where the government engages in horrific mind, body and sex torture against "suspected combatants". However, it's come to light that many of the so called enemy combatants picked up in Afghanistan were innocentand had been rounded up for $5000 a person by the narco trafficking Northern Alliance. The US government of course encouraging these guys to round up as many people as possible with the carrot stick of riches. It gets even sicker when you realize that according to Generals Rumsfeld actually engaged in some of the torture at Gitmo. So let's see...Rumsfeld lied to get us into war, then brought about plans to incite sectarian violence and insurgency...and took pride in orchestrating the widespread torture. Gee, I thought we went into Iraq to stop the torture?

But it get's even better. You see British SAS soldiers were sent into Basra in Iraq dressed as Iraqis(with fake beards and all) to blow up mosques, police stations, etc. Only problem is, they were caught, and the British army had to blow up the police station with tanks to free the men. This is not unlike news that the CIA was behind other bombings in Iraq, a technique MI5 used to provocatuer IRA bombers in years past.

The media is talking about Haditha and some of the even more widespread unspeakable horrors committed at the hands of marines and US soldiers that have only just began to be uncovered. This behavior is expected when the army is actively recruiting hardcore violent gang members and neo Nazis to go to Iraq.
But what we're ALSO beginning to learn about is private millitary contractors like Blackwater, TITAN, Caci, etc. CNN has been good at reporting at how many billions these guys make. where as private relief groups and citizens have to raise money to send adequate armor and post tour return relief to the soldiers, these PMC's are making so much more money than our brave men and women over there. If that isn't bad enough, not only is the torture outsourced to CACI and Titan employees, but private contractors are routinely caught doing joy killings and shootings in Iraq. And I don't mean the private millitary folks, but pencil pocket guys. Many private contractors have died in Iraq, but it's these private millitary groups that have really run amok while zapping taxpayer's money.
Should Dyncorp who was proven to have been behind massive child sex slavery in late 90's Bosnia be given no bid contracts? Halliburton's KBR and Dyncorp have been caught being behind human slavery and trafficking yet the government continues to rape America's finances to shell out to these guys. The private millitary contractors are just the tip of the iceberg. Isn't private corporate armies something that's been warned about out of cyberpunk and political sci fi novels for years? If only the people of ancient Sumer and Babylon knew how their land would be the focal pounts thousands of years later for this struggle. Almost...makes you wonder what artifacts were taken from that Baghdad museum within days of the fall of the city?

I HIGHLY reccomend the new documentary Iraq For Sale
by the people who brought you Walmart: High Cost of Low Cost, Outfoxed and Unconstitutional. It really exposes what's going on with the private millitary contracts, the lack of adequate care for the troops and the lies that got us into Iraq.

Monday, June 11, 2007

The Odd Couple: Just Whose Side Of Terror Is The CIA On?

After years of discussing all manner of geo-political goings on from a slightly different perspective than most may be used to, a friend of mine urged me to finally start up a blog. I've posted literally thousands of political article/threads in various forums, but never actually dedicated myself to a blog of any sort. To preface, I've always been deeply interested in politics and world intrigue.

I'm 29, and can clearly remember watching the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, wondering why my Transformers was being preempted. But I was absolutely fascinated, 1987 being not just the exposure of the government's shadow side, little did I know Iran-Contra would dovetail with BCCI and CIA-crack cocainegate.
Ever since, right alongside my keen interest in giant robot anime, old school video games, webcomics..there's, well politics. "Deep politics" I should say, going *way* past the headline. I have long since become very disenfranchised from the mainstream "left", and find myself in a kind of nowhere land with my views and research.

I decided I'm going to talk about what I see the real state of "terrorism" and war that I feel both the left and right completely misses. In the post cold war era, we hear ad nasueum from both the left and the right all about "al Qaeda" and the threat of terrorism...using that pretext as the justification for all sorts of
apetizers on the revolving agenda. But I ask...is it possible, the American government may be a bit hypocritical on the whole issue?

We saw how the "Miami 7 al qaeda plot to blow up the Sears Tower", "Fort Dix" plot and now the JFK Airport plot all appear to have had US government informants leading the would be wannabe dupes all the way. Now the US appears to be using this same tactic, but for real...in Iran. According to the London Telegraph, Bush sanctioned "black ops" against Iran. The article begins:
"President George W Bush has given the CIA approval to launch covert "black" operations to achieve regime change in Iran, intelligence sources have revealed.
Ok, that doesn't sound too bad right? A little Operation Ajax Redux, maybe stirring up some local anti Ahmad dissent groups. It's not like the US would be pulling a Brzezinski...right?

But what's this? The CIA is helping to fund and stimulate a Pakistani terrorist group called Jundullah to stage attacks in Iran? CIA is helping to fund and stimulate a Pakistani terrorist group called Jundullah to stage attacks in Iran? according to ABC News. Yipes. According to another report by the London Telegraph, the US using the CIA is directly funding these terror groups. The wording of things in the media is a tricky thing. In this recent Reuters article simply calls the terror attacks in Iran backed by the CIA as done by "Pakistani millitants".

So what's the problem you say? "Iran is our enemy, they are using proxy soldiers to attack the US in Afghanistan and Iraq and are building nukes" you might say, since that's what the neocon Fox news pundits keep parroting. "Isn't it better we attack Iran by proxy than with American millitary".

Well, what happens when this "Jundullah" group in reality is nothing more than a more vicious wing of al Qaeda? According to a top Pakistani newspaper, Jundullah is closely linked with al Qaeda.
Another top news sources from Pakistan Jundullah is a newer wing of al Qaeda. According to SourceWatch, Jundullah was originally headed by allefed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaek Mohammed.
Wow, that's funny. So if al Qaeda is attacking the Soveits, Serb positions in Kosovo and Albania...or blowing stuff up in Iran, then it's "ok".

What's even more disturbing is the that it's no secret Pakistani Intelligense(ISI) was involved in not just 9/11, but has long been reported to control and fund both al Qaeda and the Taliban.
It was the ISI who helped get an Indian airliner hijacked around Christmas of 1999, so it could be flown to Osama and company in Kandahar for Omar Saeed Sheikh to be released. Omar would go on to be the middle money man between the ISI and the 9/11 hijackers, as well as help kill Wallstreet Journalist Daniel Pearl(Evidence suggests Pearl was killed for finding out the fact ISI was involved in 9/11 and controls al Qaeda) It's now mainstream news Pakistani ISI used Islamic terrorists to kill hundreds in the 7/11/2006 attacks. It also appears as if the FBI is in Pakistan right now investigating top Pakistani government officials and the heads of Pakistani banks in massive insider trading and ties to al Qaeda funding.

The US government allowed Pakistani ISI
fly out some of the heads of al Qaeda and Taliban according to MSNBC and even a top CIA commander came out and said that the US had let Osama escape. No surprise, since according to ABC Pakistan is giving Osama safe harbor. According to the New Yorker's Seymour Hersh, Rumsfeld was the one that gave the orders to allow Pakistan to fly out top al Qaeda and Taliban and let Osama flee. In the Times of London, one of the top former CIA heads said Osama should be allowed to roam free. It should be of NO shock that even the NY Times Pakistani ISI is behind the Taliban resurgence attacking coalition troops in Afghanistan. And yet, YET according to this NBC news clip, the US government gives A BILLION to Pakistan a year to "find Osama".
What a joke. Osama is the modern day "Goldstein" trotted out to incite fear
and legitimize the nearly one TRILLION dollar "war on terror"...now that my friends, is one hell of an expensive boxcutter.


I could go on how it came out that
Sudan was behind the USS Cole attack and controls al Qaeda. And even tho Sudan ALSO is behind the genocide in Darfur, for some reason the CIA is in bed with the Sudanese government in Khartoum. We know it wasn't just Pakistan involved in 9/11, but according to top ranking US officials Saudi Arabian intelligence was involved...tho Bush seems to be covering that up. A lot of people don't know this, but the United Arab Emirates is also deeply embedded with not just al Qaeda and a Falcon hunting buddy of Osama, but is one of the main hubs where Afghani opium meets arms sales and terror funding.
Aw, sounds like the good ol BCCI
days...where the CIA, Mossad, ISI and Saudi Intelligence had an orgyastic money laundering feast with Mujahadeen terror funding, and narco trafficking and black arms finances. According to the Washington Post, all roads lead to UAE and Dubai when it comes to terrorist funding. Most of the Pakistani ISI, Saudi intelligence and other funding for 9/11 to Mohammed Atta was conduited through the UAE, most notably Standard Charter Bank(which had a headquarters in World Trade Center 7) With UAE's elites hobnobbing with Osama at Falcon Hunting trips(apparently the Arab world's version of Bohemian Grove or Bilderberg) and UAE's clear ties to al Qaeda overall...President Bush wanted to sell out our ports to these guys?

Finally, after Khalid Mohammed "confessed" at Gitmo to being behind everything from 9/11 to World Trade Center 1993(even tho that had clear FBI involvement) to practically every terror plot in existance(I'm surprised he didn't "confess" to Katrina, Anna Nicole Smith and rigging American Idol)
Time Magazine strongly linked KSM as being funded and sheparded by members of the Qatari royal elites and Pakistani Intelligence. It should REALLY disturb people that the mastermind of the 1998 African Embassy bombings and the main architect of Osama's nuttyness and al Qaeda overall is a free man under witness protection, and was once an FBI and CIA operative. Just like how 7/7 London mastermind Harsoon Awat is a protected MI6 operative who was flown out of the UK right after the July 7th attacks.

Is THIS how the western world is going to conduct business? Invoking the fear of "Islamic terror" to justify everthing from private millitary contractors out of control and torture, to everything in between...YET at the same time be knowingly in bed with the very countries that control and shepard al Qaeda? It was only a few decades ago that the CIA, NATO and Italian security forces were staging false flag deadly attacks on hundreds of innocents to blame on other forces. A few years ago according to the BBC, Italian forces planted explosives to blame on peaceful G8 protestors. I won't even get into how many of the IRA bombings appear to have been MI5 provocateured, but you get the picture.

Where does "terrorism" end, and state sponsored provocateuring begin?

As a side note, there is an *excellent* and powerful documentary about the 9/11 families struggle for justice, that goes a bit into Pakistan's role in 9/11 and al Qaeda. Here's the full documentary 9/11 Press For Truth(full documentary)

And a clip from the film that goes into the ISI involved in 9/11 from as far back as 1999.